Wednesday, June 08, 2005

Weapons of mass destruction

Why does every haircut these days in which spikiness and/or shagginess exists classify as a mullet? It's simply not true. It's not a true mullet. Everyone (well, apparently not) knows that a mullet consists of short hair in the front, and long, usually shoulder length hair in the back. Shagginess does not a mullet make, nor do a few fully-volumized spikes.

Moving on, Warheads candy was really good. I haven't had one of the squirm-inducing treats for some time now. It's more than time to get back to my roots.

Big League Chew was good, too. Whether you prefer strawberry or grape (I'm a grape girl), there will never be a better reason to stuff your face with such a large amount of colored sugar strands.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

My father used to have a REAL mullet, Liz LOL Not one of these posers these days ;)

And yes, Warheads are yummy hehe

Talk to you soon babe,
- Vinny

1:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

yes yes yes..... It's not even debatable. Perhaps it's the recent gain in popularity of making fun of mullets which causes people to overuse and misunderstand the term.

Did I ever tell you about the time I went to Cedar Point in Ohio and we spent the bulk of the day actually counting how many mullets we encountered? It was some ridiculous number like 63 and they were all TRUE mullets.

Furthermore, I think all the states should pass a law making it a requirement to have a mullet if you do in fact own a 1982-1992 Chevrolet Camaro, and do actively operate that motor vehicle.

- Joey John-Paul-George Ringo III

7:36 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Vinny - I'm sorry about your dad. Do you have any incriminating photo's you could perhaps use to aid you in getting money from him or something hehe ?

- Joey

7:37 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home